![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree with Bruce - they have clearly been cut. If they had been cut by the factory there would be steel keels on place in the triangular spaces between the ribs and barrel tubes but there is only solid solder where the keels should be.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Leon,
Thanks for posting about your VH. Overall, it looks like a fine gun which would be classified as a hunter/shooter. The number one thing putting it in this category is the shortened barrels. They may have been cut in order to open up the chokes. This was done by many people in the past. Or maybe an easy fix to muzzle damage. A couple other issues that I see that would detract from the gun is some misaligned screws, and lack of metal finish on the frame. The forend and latch have been blued which is not correct. However, the inside of the iron was not blued and retains very nice original colors. This points to the other parts being cold blued at some point. The buttplate can be replaced without too much trouble. Might need some fitting in the spur area and on the sides for sure. At least the amount of wood damage on the toe is very minimal. That original plate could even be repaired nicely. Other than that, the gun looks like a nice sound shooter. Value for resale will be strictly determined by what some would be willing to pay for a VH with cut barrels and some other cosmetic issues.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
For a long time, 30" barrels by all but the waterfowl shooters were considered out off vogue. A 1 1/2 Frame 12 is a pleasure to shoot, and you've still got respectable, and usable chokes for walk-up and upland hunting. If you think you paid too much because the barrels aren't original, just change your perspective and tell yourself you bought it a little too soon. Looks like an honest shooter and you'll enjoy it.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
The Serialization book says your gun was orginally equipped with 30 inch barrels.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
My guess is, with the clearly odd-ball length, someone cut off the damaged section and kept as much as possible. If it was done to open the chokes they would have probably been cut back to 28" even or 26" for a true cylinder and cylinder.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree with Edgar, it should be a great shooter. One of the guns I shoot the best is a Savage Fox Sterlingworth 16 ga that the barrels had been cut to 26 1/2 in. The stock is not original either, but is a much nicer piece of wood than the original forend. I new all this when I bought the gun, so I didnt overpay. It and my VH 16 are my go to bird guns. Shoot it and enjoy!!
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Fitting a repro buttplate is a real pain. I would glue that broken piece to the stock and the rest of the buttplate. Make it a permanent glue job because there is no reason to remove a buttplate on a Parker. It looks like a great Parker for all around shooting.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bill makes a good point on the buttplate. I am very partial to Brownells Acra Glas. A small kit will give years of repairs for the average person. Acra Glas has saved untold numbers of firearms and assisted in their resurrection! Here is a link. Good Luck!
http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-to...8.aspx?ttver=1
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired 'Earnest Will' 'Desert Shield' 'Desert Storm' 'Southern Watch' |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|