View Single Post
Unread 01-27-2013, 09:20 AM   #18
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,188
Thanks: 544
Thanked 20,166 Times in 5,070 Posts

Default

It looks to me as if that buttstock is a replacement. There are several things about it that do not look correct for a Parker of that era. The guard is longer than a PG guard should be, and it does have 2 screws, which is not correct. The checkering pattern is not correct either, it comes up far too high against the locks. The lock panels are a bit too defined. And the shield on the top is too large and not the correct shape for a Parker.

But, the fit of the stock looks to be good.

The gun does have value, but "value" is all relative. It is not rare or in super high original condition. But it has the value of any other Parker shooter of that age. Not a bad find for your first hammer gun.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!