View Single Post
Unread 11-20-2009, 07:53 PM   #17
Member
John D.
PGCA Lifer
Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,450
Thanks: 2,317
Thanked 4,279 Times in 839 Posts

Default

Hi Russ..!!

The only extra work is at the very beginning as we figure out the format? In other words - and again - thinking out loud....

The way I envision it is that folks can post well done pictures of the engraving of their Parkers. They can also post what they know, think, etc. The rest of us can add what we think is of interest/value or of significance.

So - from my end - I just said a mouthful - as I need to prepare a couple of "for example" threads which entail:

1) Setting up that dedicated forum;

2) Be certain that the photo abilities of my software are up to the task (resizing, album structures, etc...)

3) Author an "about this forum" document - the Engraving Forum would be about the Engraving/engravers and NOT a place to critique whether a Parkers receiver Case Coloring is original vs. restored - or critique the Parker itself. It's about the engraving...

4) Have folks contribute anonymously and allow a channel for that. For example, I believe there are few Parker collectors who want to contribute to the knowledge base anonymously - BUT - want to remain anonymous. And that's OK - as "we" - the community - are only able to gain from their selfless sharing of their pieces, so we have to be careful about those discussions/comments.

In all of this - my work is trivial compared to the potential benefits - and all I'd ask is that those who would enjoy a forum such as that - just help me out with setting up both the content (by posting pictures and adding to the discussion) - as well as helping new folks understand the "ground rules" where it's not a "critique" forum, but rather a research forum, if you know what I mean?

As I'm writing this post, before posting it - I just noticed Dave's post - Yep sort of exactly like that - THANKS DAVE!!!

Best to you Russ - and my thanks for your consistent support and kind words!

John
John Dunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dunkle For Your Post: