Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy
Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.
|
And wall thickness? Admittedly no Parker expert, but i would have expected more meat in damascus.
I measured a set of Parker tubes that I know for the fact were honed at least twice and that is almost exactly the wall measurements. I need to go back to the DGJ destructive tests and see where those Parkers fell.
Other damascus I have measured (light English guns) were thicker, and K Kearcher had lightly honed one of them for me.
Still learning here, a lot
Thanks