View Single Post
Unread 04-26-2012, 07:01 PM   #8
Member
10 bore
PGCA Member
 
scott kittredge's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,957
Thanks: 7,841
Thanked 2,633 Times in 852 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George M. Purtill View Post
there are two issues but they converge.
the first is the unsportsmanlike conduct- i agree that can exist in any hunting and your ducks, deer and crows are not state raised.
However, the $$ spent allow us to dump birds out so people, who would be too lazy to bust through cover to hunt grouse, can get an easy fix. It's put and take.
its not a self funded program or why would they bother to threaten to cut it. they move that cash flow to where ever the squeaky wheel is.
If it was self funded they couldnt cut it.
just my personal opinion. Its a program I could live without.
like anything else a few do screw it up for most, it does suport it self, some states have no grouse left to speak of and alot of people love to run there dogs. there are alot of things i could live with out too, like stocking fish . i dont fish so we should stop that, i watch people catch more than the limit and thats" unsportman like conduct". the state put them out like birds. the point i am try to make is just because you don;t like that kind of hunting don;t try to stop the people that do. i don;t stop people from fishing, i love to see people out fishing. lets stick together on the hunting and fishing sports. scott ps i have never shot a pheasant on the ground or a duck on the water unless it was crippled
scott kittredge is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scott kittredge For Your Post: