View Single Post
Unread 04-13-2012, 10:21 AM   #22
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,773
Thanks: 633
Thanked 2,594 Times in 931 Posts

Default

JB:
Your wisdom is showing again. Good.

The issue I have with steel/non-tox shot is that it is totally UNNECESSARY. The law that requires it is based on junk science. Many studies have proven this. So... to appease enviro-idiots who were occupying college admin buildings when I was hunting ducks with lead, we have a law. Based on nothing but imagined ills. And oh yes... more ducks and waterfowl than ever before -- and not one of which has ever been found to have ingested non-tox shot and kept it in their systems long enough to die of any related poisoning!

I'll wager you could pour a handful of lead No. 4 down a Canada goose and it would be in the grass inside of 20 minutes.

Sadly, the "hippies" are now running the government, and we get to ruin a good Parker with unnecessary "technology" or get arrested by one of their minions. Some Brave New World.

Best, Kensal
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post: