View Single Post
Unread 03-22-2012, 02:59 PM   #26
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,476
Thanks: 503
Thanked 3,939 Times in 1,672 Posts

Default

As I have prattled on before, we all would have been better (us and the waterfowl) if there was a tax put on lead waterfowl shells, and the revenue generated was invested in habitat purchase and restoration. Much too logical. Would never have a chance of getting thru the bureaucracy.
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post: