View Single Post
Unread 01-15-2012, 11:20 AM   #9
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,965
Thanks: 38,691
Thanked 35,906 Times in 13,167 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Masciarella View Post
Of course, I don't know anything about this but it would seem to me that, regardless of grade, Parker just used up old stock. Hammer gun production slowed a lot after 1890 or so. No reason to discard them. Grade was dependent on engraving rather then style of lever. Today, companies just throw old parts out because their lawyers (like me) tell them to do so but back then that didn't happen. Since Parker still offered a hammer gun after hammerless came out, they were probably not just used up in all early hammerless production because they still needed them for hammer guns.
We share similar opinions and I think that, due to lack of any evidence, the authors correctly state "it cannot be said" that a common assumption be the last word.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: