View Single Post
Agreed- the Baker influence was widespread
Unread 07-27-2011, 02:01 PM   #3
Member
Old and Reliable
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 1,674
Thanked 363 Times in 239 Posts

Default Agreed- the Baker influence was widespread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Landskov View Post
Your Ithaca must have a connection to my Baker. My Baker is similar, with the hammers being external, but not a side lock. Mr. Baker did have his hands in the business with Smith and Ithaca in the beginning. It is a neat gun, Francis, and should make a fine project for someone desiring a 10 bore on a budget. That was the driving force behind my 'New Baker' acquisition. My Grade 2 Parker 10 should be in the field next year.
-- Make me a reasonable offer and it is yours-the receiver is usable as is- this is a A grade mfg 1906- that was the basic grade, unlike Parkers who went from the end of the alphabet forwards to a and AA- All parts are cleaned, ready for re-assembly- coil bolt spring, rest are one pc. flat leaf springs- unlike LeFevers and Smith with a bend apex, these are scalloped for the locating pins that extend through the sides walls of the receiver- less breakage factor- Buttstock is 90% too- I repaired the small sliver at top left barrel tang- has original BP- replacement screws- barrels weight 5 lbs. and have mirror bores and heavy wall thickness at breech and muzzles- didn't check chamber depth- my guess- 2 & 7/8"--
Francis Morin is offline   Reply With Quote