View Single Post
Unread 06-02-2024, 12:26 PM   #9
Member
Joseph Borin
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edgarspencer View Post
A PGCA research letter will not authenticate the gun as you have described it, but will only list the configuration in which it was made. Because of the low grade, it most likely will not state the butt treatment, but it likely was made with a plain steel butt plate, and quite unlikely would it have had a checkered butt. Additionally, the gun is not a back action. The term 'Back Action' refers to the location of the hammer spring Behind the Axle. Your gun is much later than back action locks.
I thought all original parts and an F grade is better than a refurbished B grade, no? Also, the gun smith identified back action. Were there some around that time (1883) that were? Appreciate the comments and edification. I know nothing about these guns and would be willing to sell reasonably.

I also have a Colteer .22 LR tube loader.

I'm not a gun expert in the least and am just reacting to what my dad has passed down. thanks
Joseph Borin is offline   Reply With Quote