View Single Post
Unread 02-21-2023, 09:30 PM   #14
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,612
Thanks: 3,336
Thanked 13,193 Times in 3,489 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Franzen View Post
So they stamped it “Overload Proved” before they tested it?
That’s a good point Mike, and it occurred to me me that the subject has been discussed before. The original question was, did they test fire every gun with an overload, proofing shell. I don’t remember the consensus but if they did, then Brian’s theory that they used a mandrill the keep it round would make sense.

On the subject of stamping, I’ve probably related many times, that my serious working career (as opposed to 9 years on ships which never seemed like work) was in the steel foundry business. Every casting, from 20 pounds to over 20,000 pounds, had lots of stamped letters, indicating heat lot, and inspection marks. Much of this work was in high strength alloys the high brinnell hardness. Industry standards required that stamping be done with “Low Stress” stamps. Stamps with very sharp character edges were considered high stress and the resulting impressions could propagate cracks.
All of the stamping we see on barrel flats have sharp impressions and I often wondered if this practice predated the standards for stamped impressions.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: