View Single Post
Unread 05-06-2022, 01:02 AM   #16
Member
Bernie Cross
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 40
Thanks: 48
Thanked 46 Times in 13 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Hillis View Post
Maybe this willl be considered as being too picky but, cylinder bore at the muzzles is not "choke". "Choke" is another term for constriction and, the lack of constriction constitutes an absence of choke.

I understand, and realize, that there may seem to be a lack of accepted terminology to describe this condition. But, in the end, a gun that is cylinder bore at the muzzles has NO choke.
That is what I have always understood as the definition of cylinder bore. I’ve always taken cylinder bore as an indication that barrels may have been cut on older guns. More recently I have been told that some English guns were made with extremely open chokes for use in driven hunts and that cylinder bore was not really unusual.
Bernie Cross is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bernie Cross For Your Post: