View Single Post
Unread 03-05-2022, 08:24 AM   #48
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,153
Thanks: 4,083
Thanked 7,213 Times in 1,396 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henderson Marriott View Post
Interesting again. But keep in mind that Nash Buckingham gave up his 34 in
barreled Parker in favor of a Becker-bored Super Fox. Based on the patterns achieved on deceased geese and wild turkey at above 50 yards with coppered No. 4 shot or bore-safe enviro-metal shot, my HE Super Fox must also have been overbored, choked and polished by Bert Becker. That said , every shotgun is a law unto itself-as to shot
patterns at known distances.
Let's keep in mind that some (950) 12g Super-Foxes were made and Becker only hand massaged a small percentage of them. Also that they were patterned using long gone paper shells with discontinued single-base powders, fiber wads and 1-3/8 ounce of bare lead shot. Lastly they were "guaranteed" only for the specific shell used for pattern testing.

It's a long stretch trying to transfer that aura to Supers used with modern shells loaded with different double-base powders, plastic shotcups and non-tox or even with lead shot. Looking at a shot riddled turkey, goose or duck carcass is no substitute for objective data from long range patterning with at least 3 shot % averages with each shell. For anyone interested there's a number of articles on Supers and Super Twelves in the DGJ, including one that extensively tests modern 3-inch shells for pattern efficiency and penetration in pine (at increasing distances) from a Super-Fox, Winchester 21 Duck and a Model 12 Heavy Duck.
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: