View Single Post
Unread 11-02-2021, 09:04 PM   #16
Member
jeffery c
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 344
Thanks: 183
Thanked 165 Times in 73 Posts

Default

"Seems kind of peculiar to me that while Winchester was touting their Winchester Proof Steel, Remington moved away from the fanciful names on their barrel steel."

Researcher, that is interesting, they may have been pursuing a different advertising strategy compared to Winchester. Another thought is that though both Ordnance Steel and WPS are terrifically strong alloys, Winchester Proof steel had an edge in UTS/elastic limit and Remington didn't want to underline that fact.
Also, since as stated in the Parker Book, Ordnance Steel was used in this era Parker guns, maybe Remington had standardized on that alloy for the entire line, is another possible explanation as to why they did not advertise the fact of them having Ordnance Steel — it had become sort of a standard thing by then?

Last edited by jefferyconnor; 11-02-2021 at 11:46 PM..
jefferyconnor is offline   Reply With Quote