View Single Post
Unread 12-26-2020, 10:07 AM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,073
Thanks: 532
Thanked 19,765 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

Yes, Parker “shop language” referred to the frame sizes by the outside breech ball measurements, not the numbers stamped on the barrel lug as we know them today. Chuck will confirm that many of the earlier stock books reference this outside measurement in them for frame size, before the books started being recorded with the more commonly known frame size numbers.

The barrels were marked with frame sizes for easy identification. But the frames were not. So the frames themselves were referred to by the outside breech measurement for size. Of course after finishing and shaping the measurements will vary some.

The weight and balance of a gun can be greatly effected with how much material is removed or left on the frame. Not long ago I had a 2 frame 12g with 32” barrels that was a true “cannon breech” sort of gun. The gun weighed well over 9 lbs. The gun could have easily been built on a 3 frame. But the factory chose a 2 frame. Even when just the back half of the gun was being held, it felt just heavy as hell in the frame. Big breech balls and less filing in the body of the frame.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!