View Single Post
Unread 07-29-2019, 10:15 AM   #21
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 626
Thanked 2,590 Times in 929 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell E. Cleary View Post

Even if functional, the low hammer concept apparently never took off; they probably didn't look right .
To the contrary, if I may be allowed. Scott made thousands of "C-Hammer" guns. I've owned many myself. They function well and get the hammers down out of line of sight. But... good shots focus on the target, not the hammers.

Also... 40-inch barreled Scotts were said to be better for horseback hunting. They supposedly get the muzzle blast further away from the animal's ears. But I can't see how 10 extra inches of barrel would make much difference to a skittish mount.
John Campbell is online now   Reply With Quote