View Single Post
Unread 03-09-2018, 04:36 PM   #6
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 582
Thanks: 1,568
Thanked 1,563 Times in 351 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edgarspencer View Post
When Parker was purchased they were no longer allowed to use 'Bros., or Brothers'.
That label, if it is in fact not a 'creation' of the maker, says Parker Brothers, and I think that is all anyone need look to, to argue, it is not the property of Remington Arms Corp.
Remington may or may not use the PARKER BROS. mark (I do not know), but it can enforce--and has enforced--against the PARKER BROS. mark.

Here is my take: Since Remington owns the broad PARKER mark, it can control use of more specific composite marks, such as PARKER BROS., PARKER BROTHERS, etc. In the shotgun universe, such composite marks would most certainly be deemed confusingly similar (the legal standard for trademark infringement) to the PARKER mark.

-Victor
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post: