06-30-2017, 10:33 PM
|
#3
|
Member
|
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,979
Thanks: 38,718
Thanked 35,953 Times in 13,175 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Hause
William Welshausen vs. The Charles Parker Company
Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors
Decided June 14 1910
https://www.ravellaw.com/opinions/b6...e0e4fa0830982c
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff purchased of the defendant a gun of its own manufacture, with an express warranty by its agent that the same was sound, of best quality and fit to stand the strain of proper and ordinary use, and that the barrels thereof were of the best Damascus steel. It also alleges negligence on the part of the defendant in manufacturing the gun and putting it on the market, and in allowing it to go into the hands of customers without proper supervision and inspection during and after its manufacture and before it was sold; that the gun was weak, insufficient, badly constructed, and of poor quality of steel, and that because of such defect the left barrel burst when the plaintiff was using it in the ordinary manner and with due care, and injured him.Plaintiff lost |
Preposterous!
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."
George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
|
|
|