View Single Post
Unread 05-24-2017, 09:37 AM   #2
Member
mobirdhunter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Garry L Gordon's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,642
Thanks: 16,004
Thanked 12,267 Times in 3,800 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerald McPherson View Post
Sorry to take so long but scale battery needed to be replaced. Gh Damascus marked 3 12 weighs 3 5. Serial 117242. Total weight is 7 5. Another GH Damascus marked 3 12 weighs 3 10. Serial 88110. Total weight is 7 11. Both are 30 inch. Both are 1 1/2 frames. Can't say how accurate my scales are but it has new batteries now.
Thanks, Gerald. Your weight differentials (the smaller ones) certainly seem to be anomalies to the article I read (after searching this site...and Parker Pages) that concluded the .88 mark. That was obviously the result of averaging, but still, if that .88 conclusion is correct, it makes one ponder. Do you have letters on # 88110? If so, anything unusual, or noted about the desired weight of the gun ordered?

I appreciate your contributions to this thread. I think at the very least it confirms that Parker may have mass produced guns, but in reality, there was enough hand work (at least in the barrel striking) to compete with the notion of handmade guns. I think those of us who know and love Parkers don't find this as anything new...but it still is intriguing. I wonder if there is similar comparison data for, say, Fox guns...
Garry L Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote