This respectful and intelligent conversation, particularly its bearing on language, is interesting to me because of the 7-4 California court decision, almost two to one.
As for checks and balances, isn't the current voluminous dissent in both parties because they've worked negatively in the public interest (and have no bearing on language)?
I come here for information and it's pleasing---and a tribute to the board---to see opinions more from a community than partisan politics.
|