View Single Post
Unread 01-24-2016, 08:26 AM   #7
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 1,868
Thanked 5,447 Times in 1,514 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Hatton View Post
Hi all,

Sorry if this topic has been covered to death. I tried to search, but didn't find anything relevant.

I just bought a Parker at a gun show. My hopes were to be able to use the gun for 5 stand, but when I pattered the gun with my regular loads (1oz, 14.5gr Xtra light, and Rem TGT12 wads) it seems to be X-full.X-full. At 40 yards 100% of the shot was well inside a 30" circle. I'm doing real good at trap, but it's way too tight for any other game I play. I would never consider modifying a gun this age, but I really want something I can use for 5 stand.

My guess is this gun would shoot completely different if I was using a load that didn't have a modern wad. Has anyone done any work checking the differences between modern ammo, and reloads using fiber wads, overshot wads, spreader loads, roll crimp, etc?

The Parker is a 1910 Vulcan barreled VH with 30" barrels. I would love to have a load I could use that would open up the pattern enough that I could use for 5 stand or sporting clays. I just ordered the load data book from Ballistic products, along with some of the X spreader inserts, and overshot wads.

Rather than reinvent the wheel, I'm hoping that someone has already done the work, and I can just follow in their footsteps.

Thanks in advance

Dan
I have been very happy with the effectiveness of the X-Stream spreader inserts sold by Ballistic Products. Here are two patterns of the same load through the same gun, 1 1/8 ounce of #6 through a Remington 1894 10ga. It went from throwing 92+ % to 58+ plus %.

http://www.ballisticproducts.com/X-S...tinfo/3220001/
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0439.jpg (506.5 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg Rem189410gapatternwithx-streaminserts.jpg (489.5 KB, 2 views)
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: