This is an interesting thred (to say the least). Britain in the early 1900s, late 1890s, tried to build a reliable single trigger. Obviously this was not for instaneous choke selection since a lot of the high end guns were used for driven shooting. Double triggers are simple and reliable. However, I'm sure the other gunmakers did not want to bel "inferior" and moved to a single trigger.
DTs are simple and reliable and not needed for most shooting. How many actually care about about the instaneous choke selection? Were the original Parker single triggers that reliable?
To me, DTs are the correct approach, but modern STs are very reliable on a two barrel gun.
Ken
|