View Single Post
Unread 06-20-2015, 07:37 AM   #22
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,501
Thanks: 6,410
Thanked 9,020 Times in 3,963 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Noreen View Post
If that cylinder choke is being measured with a plug gauge, that is not an issue.
The bores of an 1889 vintage Parker Bros. 10-gauge are very likely to be much closer to .800" than .775". What are actual measurements with a bore micrometer?
Well now my 1889 EH measures M/IM with a flat gauge . So going by what you say it should be tighter going by the nominal bore diameter ? Is that true also for my Grade 2 circa 1884 top lever 10 gauge , that one by the flat gauge is IC/M both guns have barrels that are uncut .
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote