View Single Post
Unread 03-18-2010, 07:33 AM   #7
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,080
Thanks: 7,097
Thanked 10,570 Times in 5,553 Posts

Default

I think gas sealing was always the reason for 1/8" shorter chambers. I don't think that better patterns were ever a part of the equation. Pete, I don't disagree that lengthening chambers is a benign act on a less than collectable gun. However, no one can argue that it doesn't cost money, and doesn't sometimes lower the price of a gun when offered to a serious collector. I would rather have the extra steel in the area of the forcing cone than a couple of hundred pound feet of pressure. The very small rise in pressure has been proven empirically, the cost of drilling out barrels and the related shipping expense doesn't need to be proven. It is there.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote