View Single Post
Unread 11-27-2013, 09:09 AM   #10
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,701 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Yes, David, that is true for early 1880's iron barrels; that Damascus was better than the iron barrels of the day. It was not until the advent of the Whitworth process for fluid compressed steel that fluid steel barrels equaled Damascus for strength and the Whitworth process was a closely guarded secret for many years, and costly until Krupp figured it out and began competing and prices fell. Of course all the Vulcan, Titanic, etc. Parker fluid steels were compressed and void free.

Bernards are Damascus and there are several Bernard Damascus patterns, but Parker used only one of them.

For general interest, I'll post again the Damascus Parker barrels with Terrell made into the croille.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg terrellgun02.jpg (56.2 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg terrellgun.jpg (65.3 KB, 3 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: