View Single Post
And another example of how we share our wisdom here
Unread 01-15-2010, 08:07 AM   #9
Member
Old and Reliable
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 1,674
Thanked 363 Times in 239 Posts

Default And another example of how we share our wisdom here

[QUOTE=Jack Cronkhite;11219]I'm like Francis. I will tear down my own stuff and have now played with three rough Parkers, with no end of assistance from the gentlemen on this forum. Galen, you say the hammers won't drop but the triggers will move. Does the rear trigger (left barrel) move far enough to be flush along its full length with the trigger plate? If it does, the hammer should be released. If the hammer is not released, there may be a broken sear spring or broken sear or an issue with the cocking mechanism. (I chose rear trigger because it is much easier to verify extent of movement, i.e., flush to plate than it is with the right trigger) If the trigger only moves a bit but not flush to the plate, then something is interfering with sear release, hammer travel, mainspring travel, mainspring piston cup travel. If the gun has never been opened up, there may be a good likelihood of internal rust seizing the mainspring piston cup, thereby not allowing the mainspring to release its tension. Even when barrels and external metal have been maintained, after a century of time, the internal action components can get into rough operating condition if the action has never seen any servicing, especially if it sits in disuse for decades.

Since you have a nice gun and if you feel hesitant to play, take it to a recommended Parker gunsmith and then enjoy it for years to come. The Parker is a fun shotgun to shoot, especially in the field.

[-- Very imformative Jack-especially the suggestion about using the rear trigger for the "verification"- Two questions then come to mind: (1) If your Parker gun has a single trigger, does it make any difference which barrel is selected? I would guess not, but no harm in asking. (2) You mentioned the mainspring piston cup- Is that the later 1917 era James Hayes revised design style of mainspring? Both the project GHE12 (1904) and the PH 14 (1906) are the older King design that uses the flat leaf mainspring--

You are 200% right about the oil, grease and "crud" factor- The PH released both sears and the hammers fell freely as I started the disassembly process that PGCA Robin has detailed so well for us in the Technical area of our website- instead of leaving the barrels on to do this, as I already knew the mainspring was broken when I bought it, I used a block of soft pine across the face of the receiver- also verifying the firing pins--

The floorplate screws came out easily, and the dowell tap removed the plate- but Mama Mia- black grease and crud prevailed- soak and scrub with toothbrushes and pipe cleaners and Q-tips (ad elbow grease) did the job- I use a 50-50 mix of acetone and Kroil- BUT Never on a assembled gun or forearm iron w/o th wood removed first--
Francis Morin is offline   Reply With Quote