Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums

Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums (https://parkerguns.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Parker Discussions (https://parkerguns.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Early VH 20, 0 frame (https://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=22817)

Scott Chapman 11-29-2017 12:33 AM

Early VH 20, 0 frame
 
5 Attachment(s)
I just acquired my first 20 gauge Parker. It is a VH grade, O frame with 28" barrels and a straight grip. Serial number 97948. The configuration matches the research letter and it was shipped in 1900 to the Iver Johnson Sporting Goods Co. in Boston MA. It was special ordered with 2 5/8" chambers and choked R modified and L close.

I have not had a chance to get it looked at by a gunsmith yet, but she appears to be in great shape with no dents in the barrels and locks up tight.

Unfortunately its previous caretaker had the receiver blued. The stock appears to have been refinished or replaced, as I feel that the checkering appears to be too nice compared to the rough shape of the forearm. The stock also has a very small crack at the tang.

The two larger screws on the base plate are more rounded and pronounced than on either of my Trojan guns. These seem to differ from pictures of other VH guns that I have seen.

Additionally, the engraving on the elongated trigger guard tang is not complete the entire length. Originally I thought maybe the gun started out as a pistol grip and the tang had been lengthened, but the research letter states that it came straight stocked from the factory. Also, the trigger guard tangs screws also do not fit flush.

I am considering getting the splinter forearm restored or replaced and perhaps adding or having a beaver tail forearm made to replace the current one. I intend on using this old gal in the field quite a bit and I prefer the feel of a beaver tail forearm, but I am not totally married to the idea just yet.

Please feel free to give your opinions or options for refinishing or removing the blueing from the receiver and any insight into the engraving loss and apparently (to my novice eye) unusual base plate screws. I am to understand that 1900 was only the second year of production of the VH grade so I don't know if those were the factory issued screws or not.

Scott Chapman 11-29-2017 12:35 AM

more pics 2
 
5 Attachment(s)
More pictures

Scott Chapman 11-29-2017 12:37 AM

more pics 3
 
5 Attachment(s)
more pictures

Scott Chapman 11-29-2017 12:39 AM

final pics
 
3 Attachment(s)
final pics

Scott Chapman 11-29-2017 12:54 AM

trigger guard tang
 
2 Attachment(s)
Better pics of trigger guard tang

Daniel G Rainey 11-29-2017 06:32 AM

Great gun. It should be a real bird buster.

Brian Dudley 11-29-2017 07:37 AM

You are right on the buttstock. It has been replaced.

Dean Romig 11-29-2017 07:44 AM

In my opinion it is a great little gun with attributes that would make me want to do a complete restoration on everything but the barrels... unless the barrels prove to need refinishing.

Congratulations on a nice one!

Regarding a BTFE, you will not have the reinforcing screw (rod) and you will not have the one-piece forend lug so you might pull the forend lug from the barrels if you add a BTFE.





.

Todd Poer 11-29-2017 08:19 AM

Noticing the barrel thickness at the muzzle from the pics. Is that the typical barrel thickness for a VH 20 ga. built in that era. Pictures can be deceiving but that looks like thicker steel than I have seen on a good many vh guns that were mostly 12 gauge. I know that pressures can go up with smaller gauges and hence thicker metal but was just wondering.

BTW I think it is great looking gun and would be fun to shoot.

Dean Romig 11-29-2017 08:26 AM

The wall thickness at the muzzle is appropriate for those chokes.





.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org