![]() |
Chamber size
What is the consensus on having the chambers lengthen to 2-3/4 on an original Parker?
|
What gauge is your Parker and what is the actual chamber length now?
. |
It is 12 gauge skeet gun posted earlier. I’m sending it back to DelGreco to repair one of the ejectors and was going to have him check the chambers and if they were short 2-9/16 I was thinking on having him lengthen them to 2 3/4.
|
There is not really too much of a point in doing it. The short chambers were intended for 2-3/4” shells.
|
If it’s an original Skeet gun don’t do it!!
I really don’t understand why folks want to lengthen the chambers on any gun - just use the ammo that was intended to be used in it. Why compromise the originality and value of an original gun?! . |
3 Attachment(s)
I have tried to make some sense out of the information on Parker Bros. hang tags but I have so few data points it probably isn't meaningful. Generally for 12-gauge guns it appears that if they targeted the gun with 1 1/8 ounce loads they say use 2 5/8 inch shells,
Attachment 94725 but if they targeted the gun with 1 1/4 ounce loads the tag says use 2 3/4 inch shell. Attachment 94726 All data points don't fit this. It is very general. By Remington era the hang tags are pretty general -- Attachment 94727 Parker Bros. certainly was no where near as consistent as Remington Arms Co. was with the loads used to target their hammerless double. Always UMC Load No. 8. |
I have a 12 gauge DH made in 1898 with 2 9/16” chambers and I shoot 2 3/4” shells in it all day long. And I can not really discern a difference in recoil.
I’ll never have my chambers lengthened and I’ll never change what I shoot in it. I wonder what kind of ammo and what length ammo was used in these guns before they were ours???? . |
It might be worth pointing out that the length of the loaded shell is not the length that matters. It is the length of the fired hull that matters. There is usually a greater difference in the two dimensions on star crimped shells than there is on roll crimped ones, IME.
Also, there is considerable difference between the overall lengths of unfired and fired shells between manufacturers, and loads. IOW, just because the box is marked "2 3/4" in no way means the shell inside opens up to exactly 2 3/4". |
Mr. Hills is right, the variance in hulls is large and very few are a full 2 3/4. Those that are exhibit a very slight fraying at the extreme end of the crimp when fired in a short chamber gun. My experience is that it takes 4-5 firings before this becomes noticeable and in the loadings i use is of no consequence. These guns over their lifetimes have probably been fed every load commercially available with no problem. I cringe to think of the '' baby magnum'' and other abominations that have been through my guns before i acquired them.
|
Quote:
|
The first tag was referring to an unfired shell length , the 2nd, was to a fired shell length. what we call todays shells. go measure an unfired shell it will be shorter than 2 3/4 "
|
Bruce,Your model 12 shot the Remingtons because their 16 dove and quail loads actually measure 21/4" unfired and 21/2" fired. They are 21/2" shells even though the box says 23/4". I have shot them in damascus 16 gauge guns for years.
|
Quote:
|
I just measured the shells again to be sure. Unfired is 21/4" and fired is 21/2". I have seen these fired in short chambered model 12s and A5s. I am sure there are manufacturing tolerances that might cause hang ups. I am just reporting what I have seen.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a random/once fired 16-gauge Rem Game load hull from my box of empties. Caliper reads 2.615" or a nominal 2-5/8". Note how the crimp slightly contracts which also helps to clear the ejection opening in M12/16-gauge receivers. Both as written here earlier.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org