![]() |
Which looks better?
4 Attachment(s)
I am trying to educate myself as to what constitutes good, better, best.
Am I correct to think that more case color is usually better than less? And deeper, clearer engraving lines are superior to worn and faded lines? Here are two examples of 12 bore GHEs about 5,000 numbers apart. Attachment 87329Attachment 87331 Attachment 87330Attachment 87332 All other elements being equal (which they almost never are), which would you choose, and why? |
With all things being equal, i.e. grade, gauge, wood, dimensions, etc., it will always be the amount of original case color remaining that will drive value and desireability to most Parker collectors.
|
The way you’re question is phrased, which looks best is going to be in the eye of the beholder. Some guys like that honest, well worn look. I really like the look of high grade guns that have been used for their intended purpose. Others only like pristine condition. Given the choice between the 2 guns pictured I’d take gun number 2 every time. Gun number 1 looks like the finished was polished off imho.
|
Neither gun is in high condition but so what. They both have character and are nice examples of Parker Brothers shotguns. Assuming general overall good condition, I'd fix the buggered screws and enjoy the guns the way they are.
|
Quote:
a) grade ($ budget) b) gauge (also a budget item) c) barrel length d) wall thickness e) frame size f) stock dimensions g) mechanical function/integrity h) wood fit and figure i) engraving wear j) case coloring k) barrel bluing l) chokes |
Quote:
|
I could deal with either of them . I 100% prefer original even if the guns less than 30% . Now with that being said the 8 gauge in my care is totally redone , but I doubt if I could’ve afforded another like it that was let’s say 50% or better .
|
1 Attachment(s)
Steven:
I can’t argue with your list. But, in my humble opinion, I would say that any listing of the elements between A and L would be considerably modified by the attribute of originality, i.e., c) are Barrels of original length? j) is gun RE-case-colored? (as Greg (WILD SKIES) said). f) is stock tinkered with, including non-factory pads added after-market? k) are barrels RE-blued? l) are chokes opened after-market, and not by the factory? a) even the issue of Grade relates to originality, should the gun have been up-graded. To illustrate how kaleidoscopic the process of evaluating these qualities can be, here is a 12-gauge DHE that is apparently all original, but not high-condition. All that should complicate the application of the very relevant features you list. If collecting criteria were easy, who would bother? |
Quote:
|
Preservation versus conservation versus appreciation (not financial).
|
I personally would select gun number 2. I like honest used but not abused guns. I try to not buy projects but I will restore poor repairs or damage caused by negligence on a rare gun I desire. Lets say a rare example with better than average condition has multipule rust spots on the barrels and someone cleaned the rust with steel wool causing a big light area on one third of the barrel, I would have that barrel restored by a craftsman capable of producing a factory finish. Everyone has their own opinions and standards. Buy what YOU LIKE!
|
Quote:
|
I have a dear, dear friend who is in his 94th year, and in the four decades of our acquaintance, I have seen him time and again, buy what I would consider to be a benchmark gun (many makes, including Winchester 21s, Dickson round actions, Westley Richards, Parkers, etc) from a high end dealer, then immediately send it to Jack Rowe, Kirk Merrington, et al to make it more perfect.
After emptying his wallet and waiting many months, he would shoot a box or two of cartridges, show it off for a couple of months, and then lose interest. He would inevitably sell it, usually for less than he paid for it, not to mention the consignment fee. But he loved the hunt for the perfect gun! If you can afford it, it's good fun. But few of us can lose money for sport. |
I cant imagine that, if someone had a choice, anyone would desire worn case colors or worn engraving over high condition.
|
If anybody thinks they’re going to add to their retirement fund by buying and selling Parkers, or any classic SXS be it American made or from overseas, think again. And the caveat to that is “You don’t make money when you sell them - you make your money when you buy ‘em.”
. |
Sorry but I'm a little confused. I have a pair of honestly high condition 16's, one VHE and one VH. I have owned both guns for a few years and kept both as I found them. Given that I don't mess with originality, I still want to own a 20 DHE in good condition. Would you let your 16's go to get the 20, or are the 16's the better investment over time?
|
Go with the 20.
|
Quote:
|
Dean is correct, as he so often is. It's just like the livestock business, you make you money on the buy, seldom on the sell.
|
Quote:
|
The cost you laid down to purchase. Or maybe better stated Bought Right for a good if not discounted price. At least guns you don't have to feed.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You simply can’t make any money if you buy too high. That’s all there is to it. I will say however, that I’ve bought all my Parkers at retail... or at least what the seller wanted. . |
Many of us would probably have to admit that our best buys, as far as cash outlay goes, were ones where someone contacted us with an offer, out of the blue .......... or that we just stumbled onto ........... and not specific guns that we went looking for and found. Reminds me of the old saying "You'll back over more good luck than you'll ever chase down".
SRH |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org