Question for Parker Historians
 

I may have overlooked it but i could not find the answer in The Parker Story to the following question. When Parker re-barreled one of their guns, did they serial number the barrels to the same serial numbers elsewhere on the gun?

Also, does anyone know what 44 stamped on the barrel flats means?

from my experience, yes they put the serial number of the gun on the new barrels.
I would not say that was the practice 100% of the time.

4 4 is probably the unstruck barrel weight of a 12 gauge gun. 4 pounds, 4 ounces.

A set of replacement barrels would be marked and numbered in the exact same manner as any barrel set put on a new gun.

Only discrepancy might be if the barrel steel types don't line up with what original steel type. Several guns that vame from factory with damascus got replaced with Vulcan.

I have 2 rebarreled by Parker and by Remington. The first was rebarreled by Parker in 1911 and letters to that fact. The 2nd. was rebarreled Remington in 1948 and has the repair codes to that effect. The Remington rebarrel was originally produced as a 12 ga with Damascus barrels and now has steel barrels that are 16 ga now on a #1 framed gun.The Remington barrel gun has the chokes marked o the flats; the gauge, grade, and shell length on the frame lug. Serial numbers match the frame numbers.

Craig, but the important thing about the Remington rebarrel is that those extra markings (choke, grade, chambers and gauge) is how Remington normally marked Parker barrels before production ended.

Brian point is made about the additions but you left out the deletions which are no makers name, address, and barrel steel on the Ilion rebarrels, just matting.

The unstruck weight markings are on the barrel flats and are 4 with a 6 elevated to the right and above the 4. I am still trying to understand the marking '44'. Wondering if that could be an inspectors or some type of date code?

That is an interesting comment. In the spirit of just conversation, why do you suppose those barrels were changed out to Vulcan. Probably a myriad of reasons. Guns are tools that were knocked and banged around and used I am guessing and using Vulcan was just the most economical repair at the time in the evolving faster, better, less expensive industrial process management. Or, was that a conscientious decision to make a change to use modern powder.

I am probably guessing D. All the above. Unless you may know something.