Now I’m sure I have a sickness :banghead:

Well, I might as well enjoy it, just send me all of those awful single trigger doubles, I will put them to good use, and I promise I’ll take excellent care of them :)

I guess I only own 1 single trigger Parker, I think I’ve only had issues with one single trigger gun, that sporting a Kautsky

I’ve never had much trouble with my NID single triggers, never enough to make me hate them for sure

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Single triggers and beavertail forends are for guys who shot automatics till they were north of 50 and now wanna be double gun men.

I love BTFE on my guns. Rests nicely in my paw.

My preference is for double triggers on a field gun. But, to say that all single triggers are unreliable or unsafe is just wrong. Beretta, FAIR, Perazzi, Kreighoff and many, many others have single triggers that are just 100% reliable. No pigeon shooter would ever walk to the ring carrying a doublegun that was not reliable, yet close to 100% of them shoot single trigger guns at flyers.

I've shot high volume doves in Argentina twice and run nearly 10,000 rounds through that 687 SP II Sporting 20 ga. at a rate of one shell every 6.7 seconds for the three-hour long shoots we had. Never a failure with the trigger, or with the ejectors. Guns get hot and dirty during a shoot of that intensity, but never a hiccup from the Beretta.

There is no single trigger that I am aware of that will ever equal the double trigger's ability to choose choke instantly. THAT'S the big advantage of double triggers in the field, IMO. Not reliability.

Now the caveat. I'm referencing MODERN single triggers, not the Rube Goldberg contraptions so many vintage American doubles companies developed and sold. No comparison there, again IMO. Too many shooters who are only schooled in old school single triggers lump them in with modern ones, and that's very unfortunate because it's like comparing A.G. Bell's first trans-Atlantic phone call to today's cell phone communication quality.

My objection to single triggers on double guns isn’t solely based on reliability. Although I have had my share of single trigger mechanical issues. My real objections are personal in nature. Often times my failure to fire on the second shot is a result of me not allowing the trigger to reset. And many of my second shot misses are the result of me hunting the back trigger which doesn’t exist. So these should be considered operator errors. But in a game where a single target can mean the difference between winning and losing, you got to go with what works for you. And it also doesn’t hurt that the double triggers freak everyone else out.

On another note, in a game like doubles trap, a beaver tail forearm is an absolute must.

I never understood the pigeon shooters obsession with single trigger guns.

P.S. I went to my first flyer shoot in years back last winter and half the guys were shooting automatics. I was shocked.

Yes, with todays modern double guns, single triggers certainly are the norm. And that has been the case for a long time with over/unders. Today the manufactures have standardized on the few designs that are truly reliable and have proven to perform well.

I have often wondered by more modern manufacturers do not offer both single and double triggers. They clearly figure that the majority of their customers want a Single trigger. Though making a gun with double triggers would be cheaper to make due to less parts needed. I can certainly see the benefit to offering only one design from an overall cost standpoint.

I don't think it's an obsession, Destry, so much as a result of the evolution of the sport.

I've never had the problem John described himself as having with the inability to switch from double triggers to single, and vice versa. I never have to give it a conscious thought. It just happens. Same thing with some double trigger devotees who say they get mixed up when they try to shoot the rear trigger first, then go to the front one. It just happens for me without any forethought or reminders.

We aren't all wired the same, thankfully. I have no problem with "diversity" when it comes to shotgun triggers. My only problem is with narrow minded shotgunners who vocally bash what they don't care for, and that is not directed at anyone in particular participating in this thread.

I grew up shooting 1100's and 870's so double triggers were (are) a mystery to me When Remington came out with the 3200, they put on the best single trigger barrel selector ever invented. The safety is on the trailing edge of the receiver, and the safe setting is in the middle. Pushing the safety to the left selects the bottom barrel for first shot. To the left selects the top barrel. Nothing better

That would definitely not be the norm here in the Nort East Destry, I'm not sure that I've ever seen an automatic at any local flyer shoot.

Most are shooting mid level to very expensive o/u shotguns, with a few SXS's mixed in.

I believe my first SXS was an NID single trigger, but most of the guns I shoot currently have double triggers. I do not favor one over the other. Going from one to the other isn't a problem, but it did happen that I find myself feeling for the rear trigger when shooting a single trigger.

PS. My first gun was a pump gun, and No, I haven't reached 50 yet:nono: