[quote=Bill Murphy;47492].... how about giving me a block of instruction on picture posting...."


Bill, its so easy a caveman could do it.

________________________________________

Researcher, You have entered dangerous ground... I became convinced a long time ago that Murphy would happily go to his maker without ever having posted a double gun related image on the internet... You would think a guy that spends so much time requesting and enjoying other peoples photos on-line would want to reciprocate in kind, but sadly Murph has fallen short of that mark... I will donate $5.00 towards eightbore's photo posting lessons and education...;)

Best, CSL
_____________________

Aaaw shucks, I only asked if the book was any good!

There was a picture of Murphy's gold bordello gun posted, but the photos were taken and posted by somebody else.

So, Bill:
1. Take photo of gun related item.
2. Download photo into computer photo library by either cord or inserting chip from camera.
3. Click on photos from photo library and email to yourself. This correctly sizes the photos for the PGCA forum.
4. Save the photos from email into your photo library.
5. Go to PGCA forum , write your lines in "advanced ' and follow instructions in the drop down photo posting box.
6. Click upload and post.

Chris, send the $5 to a deserving Idaho charity.

So Bruce just please be clear WHY hasn't Bill been able to get the information he asks for from the people in charge? If other so called priveleged people can.

Well Tom, I am not able to personally tell you why on the basis of first hand experience; I have only second hand knowledge. I am quite frankly very uncomfortable with airing dirty laundry publicly blow by blow and won't do it.

In any community there are those who get help when they ask and others who are avoided and not helped and they never understand why people don't want to help them. Being privileged has nothing to do with it.

Tom, I have always been a bit vague about the situation you allude to. Explaining it would mean naming names and making charges. Even Bruce is not aware of the details. There are a few living members who know the stories, and have also been directly or indirectly affected by the misbehavior of some who will not be named. Unless we discuss this face to face, you will probably not get an answer to your question. In the meantime, please be aware that the verbal sparring between me and Bruce is quite benign. I may even figure out a way to send him some interesting C Grade pictures for his presentation.

Wow, only been a member for a day and I find that the first person who greeted me ( Bill) is a Bad Bad Boy . Sorry Bill.

Bill is right, Bruce is wrong...what else is new?

Peter, the terminology used in place of "Bad Bad Boy" is "mugwump". Google it and see what the history of the word is. I recently defined it for a forum member, a definition you will find if you search for it. I'm really not so bad and provide research information at such a rate as to be accused of having ill gotten material, which is not a correct assumption. I have an immense collection of Parker research material acquired over a fifty year period, none of which was acquired by theft from the Remington archives or PGCA research files, both of which accusations have been made by officers of PGCA. I have never been accused to my face, but have been provided with evidence of those behind the back accusations by officers who did not approve of the behavior of those making the accusations, and who knew that those accusations were false, or, better said, "untrue". This is as close as I have ever come to naming names, making charges, and presenting evidence. I don't want to get to that point, but from time to time, Bruce Day pushes me closer to the brink.