![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 108323 Attachment 108324 Attachment 108325 Attachment 108326 Attachment 108327 |
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
More photos Attachment 108328 Attachment 108329 Attachment 108330 Attachment 108331 |
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 108332 Attachment 108333 Attachment 108334 Attachment 108335 Attachment 108336 |
I've forgotten more than I remember in years of testing metallurgy, but the first thing I was taught was to only let the science do the talking. However, that said, the 3rd and 4th pictures of post #25 are very telling.
Eyeballs are no replacement for a scanning electron microscope, but I think it's safe to say the rupture shows great ductility of the steel and I "feel" there was no issue with the steel, and it's heat treatment. The tear at the breach end of the rupture keeps telling me there was a solid obstruction at, or just fwd of the rupture. Damn, but those striations................ |
Letting the science do the talking, those “striations” could be simply the result of lateral stretching of the metal.
. |
Dan, can you or any witness say if the break at the wrist of the stock happened at the instant of the barrel rupture, or was it the result of the gun being dropped or flung from your hands?
|
Quote:
|
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 108337 Attachment 108338 Attachment 108339 |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org