![]() |
Quote:
Not really. |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
. |
Wow Randy, that is unusually thick-wristed. What is the YOM?
. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Yeah the pics aren’t great, just trying to help spread some knowledge, as this a is a great site! I noticed in the pics the forend and stock don’t seem to match, I wondered if it was replaced.
|
Randy, are there any Remington codes on the left barrel flat?
. |
That is a thick wrist. Hard to believe the stock, or at least the stock finish is original on a gun with a receiver that weathered. Oops, I see those last pics are from a different gun. My comment holds for the first gun though; the butt looks too nice for the gun and, as stated above, it doesn't seem to match the forend.
|
Does that look like cysnide colors on the top tang area or just poor pic and Rich is right as to the fore end wood not matching butt
|
In regards to the gun originally posted about... Without knowing the serial range of the gun, I would suspect that the buttstock was a later factory replacement and the forend is original to the gun.
The rounded bottom on the checkering pattern is later. Mid 1920s and on. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org