On a driven shoot in Scotland in 2004, our host invited David Dryhurst to dinner as our guest. The opportunity to talk to a real gunmaker was one of the most informative and enlightening evenings I ever spent. At that dinner, David alluded to the most recent discovery of these Damascus barrels mentioned in this thread.

He likened the event to the exploration of the treasures of King Tut's tomb - "...wonderful things!". Later we found out that our host, a Greener fanatic, had contracted David to build the first 'post-modern' 28 ga. Greener game gun with Damascus barrels. It is a thing of beauty and a true work of art.

W.W. Greener produced new shotguns with damascus barrels in 2007-2008.
From the Greener website in 2007:
“Barrels - are made of the highest quality steel and bored to maintain the famous choke boring improvements, made by W W Greener in the 1870s, to optimise shooting performance, and to ensure patterns of shot guaranteed to meet customers' exact requirements whether for game, wildfowl or clay pigeon shooting. A few pairs of guns are being made with interchangeable steel and Damascus barrels.”

Courtesy of Vic Venters (Dec. 2008), who wrote an article in the Sept/Oct '07 issue of Shooting Sportsman regarding the Greener guns:
“They are indeed newly made damascus barrels, built on vintage tubes that David Dryhurst - Greener's master gunmaker - has been collecting since the '60s and '70s. Some are old Greener stock, some are English and no doubt some are Belgian. A few of these sets came from Dyson...They are not lined. The guns are being made in 28-ga up through 12, and maybe in 10-ga. At least 25 of these damascus-barreled guns are made or are under way, and I believe more have been ordered since I last asked. At the time of my writing, none had failed English proof. The guns are proofed under standard CIP pressures per the particular gauge.
Most are on sidelocks; some are on reintroduced “G-Guns” - Facile Princeps actions with Boss ejector work. Greeners are a small best maker - but demand has been so great that I am told they have again closed their order books. They were the last British maker to manufacture their own damascus tubes, and are the first to again offer them in commercial quantities.”


New Purdey hammergun with old 3 Iron Oxford tubes, offered by Griffin & Howe 2013

http://pic20.picturetrail.com:80/VOL.../407674819.jpg

I've bought several damascus blanks from Peter over the last several years. Still trying to convince myself which project gets new damascus barrels. He's had both 12 and 16 gauge barrels in the past. Very pleasant gentleman and knowledgeable about the barrels.

Do we know what quality of Damascus (e.g., 2-iron, 3-iron, 4-iron crolle) Peter might have available - or might be available from other NOS sources?





.

Courtesy of Peter Dyson "These original Damascus tubes were made in Belgium around 1890 and have been in storage since then. They were discovered and shipped to England in Spring 2003. The fine Belgian barrel makers Oscar & Lucien Delcour of J. Delcour-Dupont and E. Heuse-Lemoine of Nessonvaux, near Liege made these tubes."

All these appear to be 2 Iron Damas Crolle'

http://pic20.picturetrail.com:80/VOL.../365859638.jpg

Thanks Drew.

Can we presume they were all found 'rough' with no visible pattern?




.

Parker Bros. had been offering "Modern" steel barrels for a quarter of a century when progressive burning smokeless powders shotgun shells were introduced with Western Cartridge Co.'s Super-X loads in 1922. Union Metallic Cartridge Co. began offering factory loaded smokeless powder shells in 1891, and Winchester a couple of years later.

The interruption of supplies of tubes from Europe by WW-I was probably the primary cause for the demise of Damascus barrels. Our thrift Yankee gunmakers never threw anything away!! We've seen examples of Ithaca guns marked as steel barrels that when refinished had one or both tubes of Damascus or Twist, yet nobody cried the dangers of Damascus louder then Lou Smith!!

Indeed.
Wm. Powell & Son used "Fluid-compressed" Whitworth steel for barrels in 1875. The first Purdey Pair Nos. 10614 & 10615 were delivered January 1, 1880 with the “New Whitworth Fluid Pressed Steel”.
Lefever Arms Co. was the first U.S. maker to supply Whitworth steel for their Optimus in 1887. Parker Bros. used Whitworth for the first AAH Pigeon Gun in 1894 SN 79964 delivered to Capt. Du Bray. Hunter Arms first offered Whitworth on the Monogram, A2, and A3 in 1895.
P. Webley & Son began using Siemens (similar to "mild" AISI 1020) steel barrels about 1880.
Hunter Arms was one of the earliest American maker to offer Fluid Steel on other than the highest grade guns. Crown steel first appeared with the Pigeon Grade in 1893, No. A 1 (SN 1130) in 1894, was also used for the No. 3 about 1895, and in 1898 for the No. 2.
Parker Titanic steel barrels were offered for Grades 3 - 6 from 1897 until the introduction of Acme steel for Grades 4 - 6 around 1910. The Grade 0 VH was introduced in 1899 with Vulcan steel, Parker Special Steel barrels appeared on the Grade 2 GH in 1908.
'Decarbonized Steel' barrels were offered by many U.S. makers by the late 1890s, some were “Special (Cold) Rolled Steel” to a higher tensile strength; Marlin & Winchester.
More here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...EK8OtPYVA/edit

Dean, we have several rough tubes from Dyson. They average 7 1/2 lbs, 39 " long, .946 OD, .510 ID.and very rough. Even so they machine very well.

Brad

So I pose this question - Given that fluid pressed steel barrels had been in use since the late 1870's in England, and in the early 1890's or so here in America, and that modern progressive burning "smokeless" powder had come into use during the time when these barrels were in use along beside the far more numerous composite-barreled guns in use.... is there any dependable, documented evidence that ruptured barrels were caused solely because composite barrels (excluding cheap knock-off, low quality guns) could not withstand the pressures of these new progressive burning powders, and that the fluid pressed steel barrels (all things being equal) could? Meaning to say, independent studies, not the hype published by gun makers?





.