Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums

Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums (https://parkerguns.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Parker Discussions (https://parkerguns.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Would Parker have done it? (https://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=17914)

Jean Swanson 12-16-2015 09:52 AM

Do not forget Parker Brothers made around 5--- 20 bore single barrel trap guns of which I passed one up in Las Vegas some 30 plus years ago for $1500 , because I was told and thought Parker only made 12 bores in single barrel trap guns.

To answer John's question----yes----Parker was in the business to SELL guns !!

Allan

Dean Romig 12-16-2015 12:02 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Dudley (Post 183413)
I am sure they would have if a customer wanted one. But i doubt it would be on anything smaller than an 0 frame since that is the smallest hammer gun frame that was built up till then.


The serial number on this 20-gauge Lifter is 10165 and the pin separation is 18MM which translates to less than 13/16" which is the 0000-frame size. In fact, it is more than 1/16" smaller - which would make it slightly smaller than a 00000-frame size... if Parker had ever even made such a frame size. The frame sizes were determined by firing pin separation at the breech face and are incremental by sixteenths of an inch. The 0-frame has a pin separation of 1" exactly. The 00-frame has a separation of 15/16" exactly... and so on.

My point is that Parker Bros. could have easily made a .410, even in a lifter, if they so desired. That bore size was certainly being made in the British Isles at that time.


.

Eric Estes 12-16-2015 02:00 PM

Never say never. One could turn up yet. There are a lot of missing records as Mills pointed out. Wouldn't that be something!

John Truitt 12-16-2015 02:22 PM

Dean,

Is that an early lifter that does not have the recessed hinge pin?

Would smaller frames like you are referring to been more likely found in that very early period?

Dean Romig 12-16-2015 02:50 PM

5 Attachment(s)
Here it is John. It is an enigma as far as its features and configuration are concerned, but it does letter.




.

Bill Murphy 12-16-2015 03:45 PM

Think of how difficult it was for the Skeuse family to build a small frame hammerless Parker with ejectors, cocking slides, complex floorplates, single triggers, you name it. How easy it would have been to build a 28-.410 hammer combo gun on an 0 frame.

Mills Morrison 12-16-2015 03:57 PM

It even looks like a 410 frame

Mills Morrison 12-16-2015 03:58 PM

I wonder how much it would take to have a second set of barrels manufactured in 28 gauge or 410?

John Truitt 12-16-2015 04:00 PM

that is awesome. Thank you for sharing the images and info on the gun.

It is cool how they integrated the smaller breach balls with the step for cosmetics. I really like that design.

Parker did some very interesting things. Thanks again for sharing. That is one very cool piece.

Thanks for all the info guys.

Brian Dudley 12-16-2015 05:59 PM

Dean,

Wouldn't that gun be considered a sort of pre-courser to the 0 frame, when the few orders for 20g. guns were filled on a one-off basis before a standard small bore frame was made?

A lot of the VERY early Parker lifters (first couple 1,000 S/Ns) of larger gauges measure all sorts of odd sizes since standard frame sizes were not yet established.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org