PDA

View Full Version : Early EH


Mike Poindexter
03-15-2011, 10:54 AM
I have been looking for a 32 inch 10 and I found several interesting things on this EH. The first thing that caught my eye was the side plate engraving--wasn't in the typical oval. Second, the roll pin was small compared to others. I looked in TPS and read about the May, 7, 1889 patent, which means the gun has non-rebounding strikers and was in the "first" issue of hammerless guns in 1889. Locks up tight, on a 2 frame, weighs 9lbs 8 oz and fits, so, I got it. Bores mic at .791 and the chokes are .776 right and .766 left. Chambers are 2 7/8 with a distinct step at the end into the cone. From what I read, this appears to be a common early bore and cone configuration for the use of brass hulls. Havent patterned it or lettered it, but they appear original and I'm betting it prints modified and full. Minor pitting throughout the bores, but about .040 MWT so I'm not concerned. Stripped and cleaned it because the right hammer fall was gummy, and found the sear spring stud was broken. Searched for a while, and had a very good gunsmith make a new one by hand from .070 spring stock. Works like a champ now. Hope the geese see it that way next winter.

Richard Flanders
03-15-2011, 11:08 AM
Nice gun! Look forward to seeing future pics of it surrounded by deceased geese

Bill Murphy
03-15-2011, 11:08 AM
That is a very nice early E. They were once the bargain of the Parker collecting world. That has gone to heck in a hurry!

Bruce Day
03-15-2011, 11:33 AM
Congrats, Mike. I have the same in a GHE 12ga and that gun is potent for sure on ducks and long range pheasant. They are still a bargain for the workmanship, beauty and effectiveness of the gun, although I admit to doing the best I can to promote interest in these grade 2 damascus guns.

Outstanding guns when you find one that is unaltered, used but not abused, and well cared for, such as your new one.

Dean Romig
03-15-2011, 11:55 AM
A very nice find. You should give yourself a pat on the back for that one.

scott kittredge
03-15-2011, 05:34 PM
nice gun , i have the same thing in a 30 in. barrels same bore dia. as yours and choked .025 in both sides and shoots 85 % with 1 3/8ths oz 6 shot my number is 56630 you will love this gun for anything you hunt with it. love the light 10's :bowdown:scott

Mark Ouellette
03-15-2011, 05:52 PM
I also have a 1889 EH 10 on a #2 Frame. It is my favorite waterfowl gun!

E Robert Fabian
03-15-2011, 06:51 PM
My favorite ten is a 32" 3 frame NH I've had for a few years. It will pattern 89% right and 90% left wth 1 1/8 th of 7's.

Mike Poindexter
03-15-2011, 07:07 PM
Thanks to all for all the kind words. This will strictly be a goose gun for me, and I don't reload for shotguns, so I have ordered two boxes of RST Nice Shot in 2's. Will shoot 2 shells for pattern, and save the other 18 for the geese. Even though a "light" 10, this is way too heavy for me to even consider packing around for pheasant or other birds. That's what 0 frame 16's are for!

Dave Noreen
03-15-2011, 07:38 PM
That just seems to be the way Parker Bros. engraved a lot of the early Quality 2 hammerless guns. My very early Quality 2, 56213 doesn't have any ovals around the birds. Here is a picture that shows the roll on my gun. Mine started life according to the letter as a 9 1/2 pound 2-frame 12-gauge, but the frame is stamped E?!?

Dean Romig
03-15-2011, 08:15 PM
Dave, what does it weigh with the twenty ga. barrels?

Dave Noreen
03-17-2011, 10:42 AM
My gun weighs 8 pounds 4.5 ounces with the Vulcan Steel 20-gauge barrels in place and a fraction of an ounce over nine pounds with the now 30-inch 12-gauge Damascus barrels. The 12-gauge barrels are very straight and thick with little swamp, while the 20-gauge barrels swamp in very much.

Dean Romig
03-17-2011, 10:54 AM
Thanks Dave, I think you've said that before and I didn't remember that you had.
I would have suspected otherwise but Parker Bros. could and would do such things.
Yours is a nice example of just that.

Dave Noreen
03-17-2011, 09:45 PM
My Wife and I were enjoying a great road trip around Southern California, and up the coast,and I wasn't able to get the detailed specs to Austin for the great article in the recent Parker Pages.

Dean Romig
03-17-2011, 09:57 PM
That's unfortunate, it would have added some valuable information to the article.

Hope your trip was pleasant in any case.