CHUCK BISHOP!!!---REPRISE

[Steve Cambria]

Good lord, this must be an error of some sort!!!

Picked up the 2021 faceplate for the FPC Cup yesterday and had to wipe my eyes several times. I immediately phoned Ernie H. to re-check the scores on last year's Challenge. I then contacted Daryl Corona and Ken Snyder to see if our handheld target counters were somehow compromised. Astonishingly, there was no evidence of any malfeasance.

It ain't no chicken-pot pie Chuckles, but you should rejoice that "His Eminence" is now immortalized on the Fox-Parker time capsule!! Just think, in 2124 when some "picker" stumbles upon this at a local pawn shop, they'll comment, "I had no idea Joey Bishop was a clays shooter...."

HAPPY BIRTHDAY PAL !!!

109536

No need to reply, we fully understand that "past performance is no guarantee of future results!!"----Ansley H.

[Bill Murphy]

Or Hugh Downs.

[Mike Koneski]

Steve, wouldn't that be "His Eminence"?? Asking for a friend. :rotf:

[Mike Koneski]

Or Hugh Downs.

Or Ian MacGregor. :shock:

[Mike Koneski]

Hoping this year we can add another Koneski to the plate. :bowdown:

[CraigThompson]

Was this event based on 5 stand scores ?

[Chuck Bishop]

I've decided to retire while at the top of my game after guiding my Parker team to the Manufacturers Cup at the Rock this past August. Too many of the all time greats of sport hung on well past their prime. I won't be one if them.

Signed,
His Eminence

[Mike Koneski]

“Yet today (day..day..day..), I consider myself (self…self…self…), the luckiest man (man…man…man…) on the face of the earth (earth…earth…earth…).”

[Mike Koneski]

I've decided to retire while at the top of my game after guiding my Parker team to the Manufacturers Cup at the Rock this past August. Too many of the all time greats of sport hung on well past their prime. I won't be one if them.

Signed,
His Eminence


Excellent decision your Grace!!

[Mike Koneski]

Was this event based on 5 stand scores ?

No, top two scores from 50 bird events plus three by random draw (dumbest way to choose a shoot-off EVER!!)

[CraigThompson]

No, top two scores from 50 bird events plus three by random draw (dumbest way to choose a shoot-off EVER!!)

So 89 was the score of the top two combined ?

[Daryl Corona]

No, top two scores from 50 bird events plus three by random draw (dumbest way to choose a shoot-off EVER!!)

Be nice Mikey. Maybe His Eminence can chime in on his feelings on the selection process. Most shooters are here to have fun and the process only helps the range owners as they have to shoot at least one 50 bird event. I'd be happy to entertain comments good or bad on this.:)

[Mike Koneski]

So 89 was the score of the top two combined ?

No Craig, the shoot-off was done on the 5-Stand, the qualifications were on the courses.

[CraigThompson]

No Craig, the shoot-off was done on the 5-Stand, the qualifications were on the courses.

Okay that’s what I was asking initially . That being if the 89 was the score of the five people shooting a 25 bird event or 89 out of 125 .

[Mike Koneski]

Total 89 for 5 shooters. They were all true pair.