PDA

View Full Version : CHE 230160 12 ga 30in bbl


Julian Sellars
08-22-2017, 01:42 PM
Hello,

Trying to determine if anyone would have any insight into a CHE 12 ga numbered 230160 30 inch bbl. The database says built in 1928. The number inquiry form for a letter says they don't have any information on this particular gun, as did Chuck's response to a message I sent him.

New to this game, I ask, are there any other avenue's or resources available to help with a search for the history?

many thanks,

Sam Sellars

Chuck Bishop
08-22-2017, 02:17 PM
Not likely. I also check the G&H database on all letter requests. All you can
do at this point is to go back in history for previous owners.

Julian Sellars
08-22-2017, 02:22 PM
Thank you!

Dean Romig
08-22-2017, 04:20 PM
I was once custodian to CHE 230760 and sadly there was no information on that one either. It was a fully optioned Parker double trap, one of only four known to exist (until mine turned up there were only three) with 30" Acme Steel barrels, and this one may have been the only fully optioned gun to have been made.





.

Julian Sellars
08-22-2017, 04:30 PM
Dean this gun has a fat and shortish beavertail. Single selective trigger accorder to some knolwedgeble parker folk who saw it. It has the heavy lug extra metal for a beavertail. Super clean.

Dean Romig
08-22-2017, 05:47 PM
Nice! Please show us some pictures.




.

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 10:44 AM
here are a few pics

Phil Yearout
08-24-2017, 10:48 AM
Pretty shotgun!

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 10:48 AM
and a couple more

Eric Eis
08-24-2017, 11:16 AM
Now that beavertail forearm is very interesting. Can you shoot a couple of pics of the end of the forend or front of it facing the barrels? And a few shots of the inside of the forend?

Dean Romig
08-24-2017, 11:17 AM
That is definitely a specially ordered forend. It's pretty sad that there are no existing records for 230160





.

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 11:20 AM
forearm

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 11:33 AM
more yet

Dean Romig
08-24-2017, 11:36 AM
Can you show us the front end of the forend where the reinforcing rod's screw head shows?





.

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 11:45 AM
screw heads...is this what you mean?

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 12:07 PM
Ok...this is what you wanted.

Dean Romig
08-24-2017, 12:08 PM
No, the one in the very front of the forend, like this...


.

Dean Romig
08-24-2017, 12:10 PM
Perfect Justin - Thanks!

That's just what we were hoping to see.





.

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 12:11 PM
what does that tell you?

Dean Romig
08-24-2017, 12:16 PM
It suggests more to the originality of the short forend.

Without factory records to prove anything about 230160, that forend, in my opinion, looks to be original.





.

Julian Sellars
08-24-2017, 12:20 PM
Of note, it looks like the trigger, a single selective trigger, has the numbers on it as well. can just make out the last three digits on it...

Brian Dudley
08-24-2017, 01:01 PM
Wow... that forend is not much to look at by way of proportion. That must have been a VERY specific customer request as to the size and shape of it for the factory to have made it like that. But... all things point to it being completely original.

Eric Eis
08-24-2017, 02:51 PM
It suggests more to the originality of the short forend.

Without factory records to prove anything about 230160, that forend, in my opinion, looks to be original.





.

I agree with Dean on the forend

Craig Budgeon
08-24-2017, 07:48 PM
Sam, for what it is worth I had a deceased friend who owned a Monogram grade L.C.Smith which had nearly identical specs to your CHE, 12 ga. single trigger, swamped rib, 30' brls., apparent choke in both brls., and the short fore end. Several of us didn't feel that was made by L.C. due to the checkering mismatch, inletting, difference in wood color, and difference in grain.

Julian Sellars
08-25-2017, 07:09 AM
Craig, this is a friends gun I am researching; all the numbers match, even on the trigger. The wood and checkering match as well.

Who would have made the gun if not LC?

Chuck Bishop
08-25-2017, 10:54 AM
Have a competent gunsmith take the wood off the forend iron and see if the serial number is stamped in the wood.

Craig Budgeon
08-25-2017, 11:55 AM
Julian, the L.C. Smith was obviously altered but by a very competent craftsman. It was an early Monogram maybe 1910 sticks in my mind, with a Miller single trigger and a Silvers recoil pad. The gun was purchased between 1973-1975 out of Shotgun News and was used alot as the barrels were off face. The possibility that the same person owned both guns exist, the Smith altered to meet his requirement and the Parker ordered to meet those same requirements. Chasing info on the Smith may lead to info on the Paker.

Gerald McPherson
08-25-2017, 12:21 PM
I wonder if the LC had all of the cc rubbed off as it appears to have been done to the Parker. If the same person owned both he may have not liked cc.

Craig Budgeon
08-25-2017, 05:09 PM
No, the Smith had 25-30% cc but I maybe generous. The butt stock was refinished and probably the barrels. The barrels were put back on face. I have not seen the gun in 30+ years so my recollections may not be totally accurate.

Mark Conrad
08-29-2017, 03:34 PM
I tried to buy that gun from Rich Wingle back around 2004. I am not sure about the year but 2004 is close. He had it at the Vintagers and the Louisville show. I latter bought a DH that had a short forend just like this C grade. I am convinced they were both original. The D grade was in much better condition but the stock was a little short for me.

Scott Janowski
09-01-2017, 07:43 PM
Some Ithacas from that era had the same style short forend.
I bet with some research you will find one of the big dog shooters of that time was shooting one.

Scott Janowski
09-01-2017, 10:01 PM
According to Michael McIntosh Parker Invincible #230239 has a factory letter.
However search it on the site and no records are available.
I believe whoever was involved with the Invincibles,has access to the "Lost" record book for the guns in the 230xxx range.

Dean Romig
09-02-2017, 06:58 AM
That's no surprise, considering who has owned it over the years.






.

Eric Estes
09-03-2017, 08:25 PM
Not intending to start anything, "that book" has already been hashed to death as a subject, but has anyone outside of their family ever had unfettered access to it? Just curious and wondering if there is any chance an as yet unknown grade 9 is in that book?

Dean Romig
09-03-2017, 08:33 PM
There are already three known Grade 9 Parker Invincibles. Another Invincible is always a possibility I suppose - In fact, there have even been unfounded rumors of such, but seeing is believing...

Now, the possibility of the existence of a Grade 10.... Hmmm...





.

Eric Estes
09-03-2017, 09:35 PM
That is a rumor I have never heard Dean.

Dean Romig
09-03-2017, 09:45 PM
I'm pretty sure it was no more than speculation intended to start a furor among the ranks.

As far as I'm concerned, it's no more than a myth.





.

Scott Janowski
09-03-2017, 10:03 PM
The guns built in that serial number range just before the stock market crash,were ordered in prosperous times. I bet there are many interesting guns in that book. Look at the small sampling of the guns we know in that range. The ones listed are fully optioned guns. My GHE is a two barrel set, each set with a vent rib and Beavertail.