Scott Stevens Smith
06-04-2010, 04:25 PM
Hello,
Below are the picture of my new (to me) restored PH. I bought it recently from GunBroker. I am sure some of you have seen it. Anyway I had it checked out by a Dennis Potter and he measured the wall thickness and bore diameter. The minimum thickness is .030 so I guess I am good there. One thing that he found odd was the bore diameter 9" from the breech which was .757 in both barrels which he tells me is quite a bit above standard. He also tells me that he feels it is unlikely that the bores have been honed. Have any of you seen this before? The gun has 2 5/8 chambers and is choked imp/mod and Lt. Full. Anything else you can tell me about the gun would also be greatly apprciated.
Thanks,
Scott
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359166843.jpg
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359166453.jpg
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359166218.jpg
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359167078.jpg
Below are the picture of my new (to me) restored PH. I bought it recently from GunBroker. I am sure some of you have seen it. Anyway I had it checked out by a Dennis Potter and he measured the wall thickness and bore diameter. The minimum thickness is .030 so I guess I am good there. One thing that he found odd was the bore diameter 9" from the breech which was .757 in both barrels which he tells me is quite a bit above standard. He also tells me that he feels it is unlikely that the bores have been honed. Have any of you seen this before? The gun has 2 5/8 chambers and is choked imp/mod and Lt. Full. Anything else you can tell me about the gun would also be greatly apprciated.
Thanks,
Scott
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359166843.jpg
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359166453.jpg
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359166218.jpg
http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx132/texsss/pix2359167078.jpg