PDA

View Full Version : 158846


Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 12:46 AM
Thanks to everyone who gave me information on the above gun, 158846, on another thread. When I first saw the gun I copied the serial number and then after reading the reply from others I assumed I copied the number wrong. I saw the gun again today and I had copied the serial number correctly. Though the Serialization book says it is a D grade with Titanic barrels it is definitely a V grade with ejectors. The book also says it is a 28 inch barrel but these barrels measures 32 inches and all numbers match. I doubt the beavertail forearm is original as the attaching lug on the bottom of the barrel does not match the photo of one in the Serialization book. Also the engraved metal forend tip that is normally on a splinter forearm is attached to the beavertail. I will say the beavertail is a very good job with the wood matching the butt stock and checkering very well. It is a 3 frame and is a very solid gun. It should date to 1912 and I don't think the 3 inch magnum was around then. My thinking is a previous owner returned the gun to Parker to have the 28 inch barrels replaced and possibly with 3 inch chambers. Obviously a SWAG as nobody knows for sure unless it is in the factory letter. Right now the gun is on hold and I will probably buy it at the beginning of the month. I appreciate any information I can get from forum members.

Dennis

Eldon Goddard
09-26-2013, 01:11 AM
Awesome gun! It would be interesting to know when it got those 3in chambers. I do not recognize that d in the circle stamp.

Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 01:25 AM
Do you or anyone know what the AK3 looking symbol is on the other side of the barrel flats? I don't recognize it or the circled D.

Dennis

Eldon Goddard
09-26-2013, 01:38 AM
No I do not recognize that one either. Is this gun from California it would interesting if it was ordered at the same place as my 3 frame 12 in Sacramento. They are only about 120 serial numbers off.

Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 01:42 AM
Eldon,
Right now it is sitting in Denver. If I buy it I will definitely get a letter on it as I do all my Parkers.

Dennis

Craig Parker
09-26-2013, 04:17 AM
Dennis,
On Home page, under Remington Repair Codes it shows returned for service on March 1941

Craig

Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 05:59 AM
Craig,

Thank you very much. I have to admit I did not even think of Remington Repair Codes. At least if I buy the gun and until I get a Parker letter that lets a little bit of light into this. I love this forum.

Dennis

Dean Romig
09-26-2013, 06:42 AM
You're right about the forend loop on the barrels. Another confirming fact that the BTFE is aftermarket is that the forend iron is not of the BTFE type that will accept the reinforcing screw.

Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 06:49 AM
Dean,

Is that the bolt that runs back from the very front of the forend? Any ideas on why the book shows this gun as a D grade rather than V grade? Is it just a mistake in the Serialization book?

Dennis

Dean Romig
09-26-2013, 07:21 AM
Yes, that is the bolt.

I'm sure it is just an error in the Ser. Book. There's nothing about that gun that would even suggest a D or Grade 3 gun.

I can't even venture a guess as to the significance of the D in the circle stamp. D Grade guns never had that stamp. Where the V in the circle is stamped a D Grade would have had a T in a circle for Titanic Steel or a D for Damascus. The grade of the gun would be stamped as a number 3 in the location where the D in the circle is stamped.

Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 07:31 AM
Thanks, Dean.

Dennis

charlie cleveland
09-26-2013, 09:36 AM
i like this gun for what it is a 3 inch chamber aset of 32 inch barrels and a 3 frame in 12 ga..not many parkers seen this way..what a duck gun she musta been and will still will be...lucky find for sure... charlie

Bill Murphy
09-26-2013, 10:15 AM
The text of the PGCA letter will include information from the order book, which will be a different source than the serialization book information. You should get your letter now. I am not sure what the factory Remington 3" markings look like, but I would be they look like yours.

Dennis V. Nix
09-26-2013, 08:14 PM
Thanks, Bill.