![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
OOPS! Got the serial# wrong in my serial # post.
Thanks for catching that D Lab.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Here's one of the whole gun if anyone is interested.
I'm beginning to get Classic Parker Fever!
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Dean,
If You would go to page 2 of this post you will see the pics you asked for. Dave |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to David Lampman For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Ok, does this sound probable?
I have a G grade 1907 hammerless, with a #2 receiver, with matching serial numbers (145858), that originally came with 32" damascus barrels that have been replaced. Because of the matching serial numbers it may have had a barrel change by Parker to Vulcan steel barrels. But at some time later the barrels were cut about an inch (if they were 26") leaving enough choke to measure .720 at the muzzle. Thoughts? |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to David Lampman For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
That's plausible.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|