![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Bobby, I've never seen or even heard of a Parker marked that way by the factory, but that's not to say it couldn't have been. When it comes to Parkers we never say "never."
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Some time back we saw pictures of, as I recall, a late 1-frame 12-gauge, marked on the top of the barrels STANDARD VELOCITY ONLY or something close to that.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Yes, there was a thread with pictures of a 20 with the stamp. I put a reference in a post to a DGJ article called "Some American Lightweights" that had photos of a 1 frame 12 with the stamp as well. Here is a link to the thread.
http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...n+Lightweights |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Looks to me like the FOR STANDARD VELOCITY ONLY legend was engraved, not a roll-stamp. Larry's 20-gauge --
230978 02 FOR STANDARD VELOCITY ONLY.jpg From The Double Gun Journal, Volume Thirteen, Issue 4 -- FOR STANDARD VELOCITY ONLY 12-gauge 1-frame, DGJ Volume 13,Issue 4.jpg |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Interesting stamp. One wonders why, when the barrel flats are stamped with the typical “Parker Bros. Overload Proved”, the warning stamp would also be on the exterrior of the barrel breech…
The gun is in high original condition so I wouldn’t suspect there would be any reason for such a warning. Are there any Remington service codes on the left barrel flat? The lug is in the way of being able to read anything tight against the lug. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| Another example.... |
|
|
#8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Follow a good dog while carrying a fine shotgun and you will never be uninspired. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Weber For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Researcher, Larry Stauch's 20 was made in 1929. Do you know if there any new powders or high velocity factory loads introduced around then that Parker may have had concerns about shooting in their lighter guns?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | |||||||
|
Quote:
However, the high velocity loads pushing that 1 1/4 ounce in 12-gauge or the new heavier 1 ounce load in 20-gauge at higher velocity would have greater recoil that might be hard on a light gun or shooter. Also, we know nothing about the chambers in these guns. If the 12-gauge was chambered for the 2 5/8 inch shells, which in 1929 only came in 1 or 1 1/8 ounce loads, why not just mark the chamber length. Same with the 20-gauge if chambered for 2 1/2 inch shells. My 1930 VH 20-gauge has the same 2 15 weight stamp on the barrel flats and has the 2 3/8 inch chambers for the 2 1/2 inch shells and it isn't marked like Larry's gun?!? Many ponderables. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|