![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | |||||||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Critics complain that the Axtell's aren't up to Shiloh Sharps quality. Mine looks okay to me. I can see some slight flaws in the inletting, but not much. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
That is not an ugly gun. Can we see a few more pictures?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Dam fine English sharps (1877). Looks pretty good to me.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I can take some more pics of the rifle, of course. I don't have many really fine guns, a few Parkers, a Winchester 73 and nice model 70 in 270 and then some old double barreled shotguns, but the Axtell Sharps is my only gun that catches one's breath. I don't think the original owner shot it. Bought it used at Martin Rettings in Culver City, CA.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|