![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
The 28 gauge is an absolute joy to shoot and hunt with. I'm happy with my Grulla 216 and Browning Citori. While it would be wonderful to own a Parker Gun in 28 gauge, I cannot justify the cost for one. Just me.
I have owned a few .410 shotguns over the years. I like them, but they are not for me as a bird gun. I know folks use them for grouse and such, but my personal experience was too many wounded birds rather than clean kills. I use them for introducing pups to shotgun fire after a few blank rounds. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
A 28 gauge Parker DHE was WHF’s favorite Skeet gun… and his favorite grouse gun as well.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
If you look at NSSA averages for a AAA shooter the 12-20-28 are all .25% apart, the .410 is 2% lower (this is for classification not the scores). I take that to mean that over a long time with shooters of similar ability the .410 is 2% less effective but still shooting 96.5%. For the average bird hunter/recreational shooter I'm not sure that translates at all.
__________________
Before we work on artificial intelligence why don't we work on natural stupidity |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I'd love to have a VH Parker in both .410 and 28. BUT, no way I'm dumping that kind of scratch into a shotgun. If I have that kind of disposable cash it'll buy something that with one pull of the trigger can do a mag dump. To each his own.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
One of the reasons for slow sales of the .410-bore Parker during the early years was the available ammunition. From the introduction of the .410-bore shell in North America circa 1914 it was offered in two loadings, 3/10-ounce in a 2-inch shell and 3/8-ounce in a 2 1/2-inch shell. Things picked up for the .410-bore in 1933, at the depth of The Great Depression, with the introduction of the 3-inch shell doubling the max load to 3/4-ounce, along with the Winchester Model 42. A few years later the 2 1/2-inch shell got upped to the 1/2-ounce load we all know.
Similarly, the 28-guage loads were 5/8-ounce for many years. Finally, in 1931 the ammo companies got around to introducing a progressive burning smokeless powder, high velocity load to the 28-gauge with 3/4-ounce of shot. Chas. Askins mentions in his 1910 book of loading 2 1/8 drams of bulk smokeless and 3/4-ounce of shot in the 2 7/8-inch 28-gauge shell for his heavy 30-inch barrel Parker Bros. but the ammo companies didn't offer anything heavier than 2 drams pushing 5/8-ounce. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Turns out what goes around comes around. The old 5/8oz load is a dandy if you handload.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
After today's G&D auction, I think it is safe to say that prices for Parker 28s and 410s are still strong. The 410s blew past high estimates.
-Victor |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Here is a reasonable one we all could have bought.
Bob Jurewicz https://bid.guyetteanddeeter.com/lot...-skeet-shotgun |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bob Jurewicz For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|