Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
8 Gauge Bore Leading
Unread Today, 11:15 AM   #1
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 920
Thanked 1,000 Times in 402 Posts

Default 8 Gauge Bore Leading

Cleaning the WH Monk after the Southern I noticed significant lead in the bores from the forcing cones to the muzzles. A Chore Boy copper scrubber on a bore brush and Kroil got most of it out. But how to avoid this? It was recommended to me to use a plastic wrap in the shot cup so I ordered a big bag from our friend in Alberta. What is the experience of 8 bore shooters using this wrap? Is it an effective means of preventing lead in the bores?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1103.jpg (524.7 KB, 3 views)
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread Today, 01:47 PM   #2
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 13,233 Times in 2,030 Posts

Default

I had a significant leading issue when I went from the SP-8 Remington wad to the 8ga Hi-Capacity wad. The shot cup in the Hi-Capacity wad is much shorter. If u fill the short cup with filler wads it leaves most of the lead unprotected. I solved the problem with my reverse stack load. Most of the shot is in the shot cup since the filler wads are under the plastic wad. For me it has completely eliminated the leading problem. Powder followed by a .070 8ga card wad, then the 1/2" filler, then the 8gs Hi-Capacity. I had the load test by Tom Armbrust.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1000002683.jpg (161.0 KB, 1 views)
Craig Larter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread Today, 03:09 PM   #3
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 920
Thanked 1,000 Times in 402 Posts

Default

Thanks Craig. What an interesting concept. Is there much pressure difference between the reverse stack and the conventional stack loads?
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread Today, 03:19 PM   #4
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,903
Thanks: 6,764
Thanked 9,525 Times in 4,200 Posts

Default

Bit of adjustment .
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_2312.jpeg (389.2 KB, 3 views)
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Unread Today, 03:26 PM   #5
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 920
Thanked 1,000 Times in 402 Posts

Default

Thanks Craig. I’m not sure why my phone does that.
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ed Blake For Your Post:
Unread Today, 04:16 PM   #6
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 13,233 Times in 2,030 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Blake View Post
Thanks Craig. What an interesting concept. Is there much pressure difference between the reverse stack and the conventional stack loads?
The stacked load was 1163fps, 7066psi, the traditional load was 1183fps, 6833psi. Basically the same.
Craig Larter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig Larter For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.