|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
07-21-2021, 03:53 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,981
Thanks: 3,603
Thanked 14,579 Times in 3,788 Posts
|
|
The taper wall of the choke portion departs from the straight wall, and the shorter the the choke, the greater the angle. Yes, that is the unbalanced force (action/reaction) that shot which begins changing direction rebounding from the choke wall begins a disruption in the mass of the shot stream.
In a true cylinder bore, that shot mass is impacted by no unbalanced force, and tends to stay in closer proximity to the center line.
All of this is my conjecture, and I can be convinced I'm wrong, but what supports my belief is lots of pattern paper shows a shot density well tighter than Skeet 2, approaching modified. I never gave it enough thought but I am sure that wad type will have some effect as well. It simply makes sense, that in the absence of anything that will alter the shot direction as it travels down and out the bore, the total shot mass will continue in a straight direction.
All barrels shoot to a certain point of impact. I do have a gun with two sets of barrels; one being cut from 30" to 24", the other being more or less Imp.Cyl and Modified. I fully expect that if I draw a circle around the total pellets of the cylinder bore barrel, and then shoot at the same paper with a choked barrel, there will be new holes. Beyond some distance, this will, no doubt, be less noticeable.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
07-21-2021, 04:38 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
PGCA Invincible Life Member
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 34,113
Thanks: 41,491
Thanked 38,266 Times in 13,865 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edgarspencer
n and out the bore, the total shot mass will (wants to ?) continue in a straight direction.
All barrels shoot to a certain point of impact. I do have a gun with two sets of barrels; one being cut from 30" to 24", the other being more or less Imp.Cyl and Modified. I fully expect that if I draw a circle around the total pellets of the cylinder bore barrel, and then shoot at the same paper with a choked barrel, there will be new holes (presuming you mean outside of the scribed circle?) Beyond some distance, this will, no doubt, be less noticeable.
|
A question Edgar...
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."
George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
|
|
|
|