Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-08-2021, 05:45 PM   #1
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,855
Thanks: 6,723
Thanked 9,465 Times in 4,173 Posts

Default

Not the best pics but you should be able to see the difference . Also adding a bit to the idea the fact that the hammer gun is on a larger number frame and weighs atleast 1 1/2 more pounds .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 043FB193-D3F0-4AD7-9A26-BB7865A56A1B.jpg (532.5 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg F7FC8F0F-AC6A-49D9-B0FA-2DCF33F6ADFF.jpg (508.9 KB, 3 views)
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Unread 05-08-2021, 06:19 PM   #2
Member
Milton C Starr
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,509
Thanks: 476
Thanked 1,010 Times in 466 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigThompson View Post
Not the best pics but you should be able to see the difference . Also adding a bit to the idea the fact that the hammer gun is on a larger number frame and weighs atleast 1 1/2 more pounds .
Ive always thought it just looked thicker on the hammerless guns because the wood behind the breach is not relieved for the hammers so it looks thicker . If you really want to see a drastic difference like this look at a 4 gauge/bore hammer gun vs modern hammerless ones The new ones look way out of proportion . I was reading about Watson Bros 4 gauge double and they mentioned how theirs was better proportioned than the other English made modern 4 gauge . Which I think that was a slight at Westley Richards 4 gauge droplock .
Milton C Starr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-08-2021, 06:57 PM   #3
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,855
Thanks: 6,723
Thanked 9,465 Times in 4,173 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milton C Starr View Post
Ive always thought it just looked thicker on the hammerless guns because the wood behind the breach is not relieved for the hammers so it looks thicker . If you really want to see a drastic difference like this look at a 4 gauge/bore hammer gun vs modern hammerless ones The new ones look way out of proportion . I was reading about Watson Bros 4 gauge double and they mentioned how theirs was better proportioned than the other English made modern 4 gauge . Which I think that was a slight at Westley Richards 4 gauge droplock .
You put your hand around both the ones I have and it’s a big difference in the WRIST . Don’t much care about the euro makers just intrested in the Parker 8’s and maybe the Smith’s . I will however in regards to the euro big guns say this , a sort of friend/Gun broker that lives close came by the shop one day with a hammerless Scott or Greener have forgotten which . Anyway it had 10 gauge fluid steel barrels VERY thick in the breech end however it was kinda fine in the wrist and we sent it to Orland to have the stock bent . I found out later the gun had a set of damascus 8 gauge barrels at home that were original to the gun and later in life it was fitted with the 10 gauge barrels at the factory .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.