Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Restoration

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 10-04-2018, 06:25 PM   #12
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,852
Thanks: 3,514
Thanked 14,114 Times in 3,687 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I wonder if the pin hole on one side of the frame is slightly larger than the pin hole on the opposite side.
I wouldn''t think so, because the pin would then be somewhat looser fitting than the other side, and , at least in theory, the sear, on that side would not square up with the interfacing surface of the hammer.
Someone mentioned deforming the pin slightly, making it slightly out-of-round.
That may sound somewhat like a "shade tree" fix, but I think, properly done, might be ok. As John mentioned, most 'pinned' British boxlocks used a tapered pin, and, while I'm comfortable in saying I do not believe Parker ever employed this technique, it would have been preferable to the way it was done.
Generally, I think the sear spring exerts sufficient pressure to keep the pin centered, but, Russ's gun might suggest otherwise.
I've never liked the idea of using thread locking glues on good guns.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.