Please Help Me Welcome....

[John D.]

And to Scott Hanes....

Thank you..!!! Your Member title is all set - and with our appreciation!

John

[Dean Romig]

John, are you tracking renewals seperate from new registrations on those who have done so online?

[John D.]

Hi Dean..

HUH???? What did you say???

I track on-line Memberships - both NEW members and RENEWED Members? Both are equally welcomed. Is that what you are asking?

John

[Dean Romig]

No John, I know you welcome everyone who joins or renews (you're that kind of guy - friendly, warm and sincere) I was just curious how many new members have signed on here vs. the number of renewals using this new feature. I don't think it will tell us anything - I'm just curious about the numbers split.

[John D.]

Hey Dean and all..!

Awww - I see what you mean..! Right now, it's about 80-85% are renewed vs. 15-20% new (as a SWAG).. I suspect that will change in the next few months, though - becoming about a 60%-40% (renewal - new) mix...

For mail in memberships - it's about the same right now as the on-line ratio...

Best to you!

John

[TARNATION !!!]

Originally Posted by John Dunkle

Hey Dean and all..!

Awww - I see what you mean..! Right now, it's about 80-85% are renewed vs. 15-20% new (as a SWAG).. John

If SWAG were taken out of research, the scientific literature would be approximately 3 pages - just a SWAG
Cheers,
Jack

[John D.]

Originally Posted by Jack Cronkhite

If SWAG were taken out of research, the scientific literature would be approximately 3 pages - just a SWAG..

Hi Jack..!

You may be right.. In fact, it's a fact that about 86% of all statistics are "made up"..??!!



HTH!!!



John

[Dean Romig]

Exactly! Thanks John, that's what I meant. Sorry I wasn't clear at first.

Dean

[John D.]

And to Craig Reynolds - thank you!!



John

[John D.]

And Mark (you know who you are ) - thanks my friend for your continued support!

John